responsible for setting

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "responsible for setting" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing someone’s duty or role in establishing or determining something, such as policies, standards, or schedules. Example: "The project manager is responsible for setting the deadlines for each phase of the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

She holds herself responsible for setting limits.

The New York Times

Bill and Ella were responsible for setting up Radio Times.

Independent

It became responsible for setting Greenwich Mean Time.

The Guardian - Business

Residents are responsible for setting up their own ConEd account.

Columbia University

She has been responsible for setting up the seating charts at the Four Seasons restaurant.

The New York Times - Food

"The DWP are responsible for setting the policy and making the decision.

The Guardian

Cooper was usually responsible for setting them up and synching them to the server.

The Guardian

Such commissioners would be "statutorily responsible" for setting up new schools.

The Guardian - Opinion

They will also be responsible for setting a timetable for a Syrian withdrawal.

The New York Times

You are responsible for setting and maintaining the security of your password.

Harvard University

9. Authors are responsible for setting up and removing their posters themselves.

Columbia University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "responsible for setting", ensure the context clearly defines what is being set, such as "responsible for setting the budget" or "responsible for setting the agenda".

Common error

Avoid using "responsible for setting" without specifying what is being set. This can lead to confusion about the scope of responsibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "responsible for setting" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating who or what is in charge of establishing or determining something. Ludwig AI indicates that this is a correct and usable phrase in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Academia

21%

Science

17%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "responsible for setting" is a grammatically correct and widely used expression for indicating the duty or obligation to establish or determine something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Academia and Science. To ensure clarity, it is crucial to specify precisely what is being set. Alternatives such as "in charge of establishing" or "tasked with determining" can be used to convey similar meanings with slight nuances. With a high expert rating, the phrase remains a reliable choice for professional and formal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in charge of establishing

Emphasizes control and authority in the act of establishing.

tasked with determining

Highlights the assignment of a task to determine something specific.

accountable for defining

Focuses on the obligation to define something and be answerable for it.

entrusted with establishing

Implies a level of trust in the role of establishing something.

authorized to set

Stresses the official permission to set something.

designated to define

Highlights the formal designation to define something.

empowered to establish

Emphasizes the power or ability granted to establish something.

overseeing the setting of

Focuses on the act of supervising the setting process.

having the duty of defining

Highlights the obligation to define something.

playing a role in establishing

Suggests a contribution to the establishment of something, but not necessarily sole responsibility.

FAQs

How can I use "responsible for setting" in a sentence?

You can use "responsible for setting" to describe a person or group's duty in establishing or determining something. For example, "The committee is responsible for setting the guidelines".

What are some alternatives to "responsible for setting"?

Alternatives include "in charge of establishing", "tasked with determining", or "accountable for defining", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "responsible to set" instead of "responsible for setting"?

While "responsible to set" might be understood, "responsible for setting" is the more common and grammatically accepted phrasing. "Responsible to set" could imply a duty to initiate the setting process, but lacks the clarity and common usage of "responsible for setting".

What's the difference between "responsible for setting" and "involved in setting"?

"Responsible for setting" implies a direct duty and accountability for the setting process, whereas "involved in setting" suggests participation without necessarily having the primary responsibility. The former indicates ownership, while the latter indicates contribution.