When the Senate pressed General Alexander, the new head of U.S. Cyber Command, to explain how the United States would deal with these issues, his responses were classified.
The responses were classified like correct (from the chemical point of view), incorrect (incomplete, regular, wrong) and not answered.
An investigation was conducted to find whether responses were classified as mathematical questions, non-mathematical questions, or statements.
In analysing the students' assessment of the accuracy of their measurements, 101 responses were classified into eight groupings.
Medication responses were classified as significant effectiveness (50 % reduction in headache days of moderate to severe headache), partial effectiveness, and no improvement or worsening symptoms.
Responses were classified as callbacks if the employer requested an applicant to contact them (not just for clarification) or invited him/her for an interview.
In the PIAAC, fast non-responses that can be understood as disengaged responses were classified as not attempted items, while non-responses taking more than 5 s were considered wrong responses (OECD 2013b).
All APDs were plotted as a function of the preceding DI, which allowed simultaneous observation of dynamic, S1-S2, and two constant-BCL restitution curves in a "restitution portrait". Responses were classified as 1 1 (stimulus:response), transient 2 2, or persistent 2 2 (alternans) and were related to the slopes of the restitution curves.
Objective tumor responses were classified into partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and PD.
Responses were classified in four types: yes to S1 (hit), no to S1 (miss), yes to S2 (false alarm) and no to S2 (correct rejection).
Physical exercise was assessed by enquiring about the frequency of moderate and vigorous activities, and responses were classified into three categories: none, up to twice per week, and three times per week or more.
