Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(41)
The authors of the original paper were really interested in testing people's responses to statements that were totally without meaning.
At both points, researchers looked at political attitudes (views on topics such as abortion and gay marriage, as well as responses to statements such as "I believe we should look to our religious authorities for decisions on moral issues") and personality measures.
We found little support for sex differences in responses to statements about evolution and the nature of science.
A large positive correlation exists between the responses to statements 15 and 18 (r(74) = 0.41, P <0.01).
We address first the quantitative responses to statements on videos and then qualitative reflections on how they contributed to learning.
In summary, we see many of the same patterns in the interaction of responses between groups that differed in their responses to statements 1 and 5 (Table 3).
Similar(19)
b Matched pre-post responses to statement 8.
a Matched pre-post responses to statement 7. Have you met a scientist?
Students are fairly evenly split in their responses to statement 11 ("Humanity came to be through evolution, which was controlled by God").
A small change in awareness was detected in responses to statement 14, suggesting that information sharing without examination of evidence has limited impact.
Pre-intervention SA/A responses to statement 12 "The food a woman eats when she is pregnant affects the health of her baby" were high (53.1/40.8%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com