Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Post, at 53, n. 5. Justice WHITE's response to this point is unconvincing.
Well, Baker et al have what I think is meant to be a response to this point in Vox.
(Update/Side note: One commenter, Andre Swanston, has a great response to this point).
Much could be and has been said by anti-realists in response to this point.
In response to this point, Terence Cuneo (2001: 581) distinguishes between strong and weak primary quality views.
However it seems that, at least in the first instance, Wright has a relatively quick response to this point at his disposal.
Similar(51)
However, from a consumer point of view, at least one solution has arisen in response to this pain point: the Shopta browser extension.
[Author's Response] I provide an extensive reply to this point with Reviewer 3.
In response to this important point, it might be argued that when luck-egalitarians write about "neutralizing luck", this is really short-hand for something like "eliminating the differential effects on people's interests of factors which from their perspective are a matter of luck".
In response to this interesting point, Seebohm et al. interpret KCNQ1 channel inactivation using two open states with different conductances that are occupied sequentially.
This natural response to this example points us towards one common way of identifying the kinds of wrong that do properly concern the criminal law the idea that conduct which is to be criminalized ought to constitute a 'public', rather than a merely 'private', wrong.
More suggestions(15)
response to this which
addressed to this point
answered to this point
responding to this point
responded to this point
regards to this point
proposed to this point
response to this knowledge
response to this fact
response to this type
response to this prospect
response to this provocation
response to this gambit
response to this paper
response to this development
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com