Suggestions(5)
Exact(29)
The oil lobby has no response to this argument.
The standard relationist response to this argument is to point out that the actual universe contains a great deal more than the hypothetical universe of Newton's thought experiment.
He invites Air Products to submit a full response to this argument and quotes Air Products' lawyer to ask whether this was all one "big 'moot court exercise".' The judge also poses new questions to Airgas.
In response to this argument, I wrote:Entrepreneurs are interested in maximising profit, and in order for this desire to result in the creation of good educational outcomes, a number of conditions must be in place.
(But see Nelson (2002) for a response to this argument).
Judge Jones's response to this argument was typically comprehensive and compelling.
Similar(31)
One possible White House response to this line of argument is: So what?
("We spent ourselves into bankruptcy!" Moynihan told me, in response to this line of argument).
For a contemporary response to this line of argument, one might look to the program of decoherence.
One response to this line of argument has been to claim that embryos possess a kind of potential that somatic cells and HESCs lack.
Fictionalists have offered two responses to this argument.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com