Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(18)
To better characterize the CD4+ T cell response, responses to known class II-restricted (I-Ed) CD4+ T cell epitopes for H, F and N proteins [65] [70], as well as L cell lysates and peptide pools, were assessed (Fig. 7).
From 24 trials in each task, the following number of trials were removed due to an unrecognizable response (responses not exceeding 2 standard deviations of the baseline): (1) for anticipation task EO: [mean (standard error)] 3.8 (2.4), IO: 3.7 (2.3), LE: 3.6 (2.5), and MU: 3.3 (2.7) and (2) for reaction task EO: 2.1 (2.0), IO: 2.6 (2.6), LE: 2.1 (1.8), and MU: 2.0 (2.0).
Results We received 190 responses (response rate 66%%).
We received 190 responses (response rate 66%%) including 34 % of residents.
332 responses (response rate; 64.5%) were received from the authors.
We received 695 survey responses (response rate, 28%).
Similar(42)
Accordingly, all terms were classified into different functional modules including "defense response," "response to stress," "hemostasis" and "cellular localization".
Response: 'Response' time is defined as the time in minutes from receipt of call until the vehicle arrives on scene.
After confirmation of complete response or partial response, response evaluation was determined every 8 weeks.
The cluster contained 102 terms of which many indicated an immunological response ("TGFBr - signalling", "response to stress", "defence response", "response to wounding", response to external stimulus", "inflammatory response").
Along with intercolonial responses, responses of individual colonies versus pooled data to the treatments were investigated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com