It has been the objective of this modelling study to challenge different model circuits with respect to their ability to account for a preference of FD-cells in the blowfly visual system for small moving objects as well as the characteristic dependence of their responses on object and background velocity [25], [26].
Responses that did not align with the descriptive categories were listed as 'other' (example includes response of 'climbing on object').
In the absence of other data, it could be argued that the LIM responses depend not on object size per se (e.g., the averaged surface area), but instead on the summed extent of the visual field encompassed by the stimulus.
This database [20] was initially formed in response to the IEEE Int'l Workshop on "Object Tracking and Classification in and Beyond the Visible Spectrum".
We analyzed the dependency of the cell response on the overall nearness of objects in natural scenes as averaged over an area in the visual field, matching the most sensitive region of the cell's receptive field.
In the other half of the trials, the rotation did not lead to a positive matching response, because the object on the right was a rotated mirror image of the object on the left ("mirror").
Under Insert tab, click on "Object".
People begin by forming a value-attitude based on one's initial affective response to the object of valuation.
After a correct response, both objects remained on the screen for 500 ms. After an incorrect response, both objects disappeared immediately.
This paper reports the results of shaking table tests performed to assess the response of an object placed on a vibration isolator to intense ground motions whose peak accelerations are close to or over the gravity acceleration in both vertical and horizontal directions.
