Sentence examples for response means from inspiring English sources

Lastly responsiveness (standardized response means [SRM]), floor and ceiling effects and interpretability (minimal important change [MIC]) were analyzed.

Validity was tested using factor analysis and Rasch analysis, and responsiveness using standardised response means.

Low standard response means were found for responsiveness (0.0 to 0.4).

Effect sizes (1.15-1.93) and standardized response means (1.17-1.86) showed good responsiveness to change.

The standardised response means were high indicating good responsiveness of the score for detecting cartilage change.

Responsiveness is given as effect sizes and standardized response means for all KOOS subscales.

With respect to responsiveness it can be concluded that low standard response means were found (0.0 to 0.4).

Standardised Response Means (SRM) were used to evaluate the subscales' responsiveness.

Responsiveness was tested using effect size (ES) and standardised response means (SRMs) [ 27, 28].

Standardized response means (SRMs) and effect sizes (ES) were used to measure responsiveness.

Responsiveness was tested by examining floor and ceiling effects and standardised response means.