Sentence examples for response in normal from inspiring English sources

Hair cell condition and auditory nerve response in normal and noise-damaged cochleas.

Kannurpatti, S. S., Motes, M. A., Rypma, B. & Biswal, B. B. Neural and vascular variability and the fMRI-BOLD response in normal aging.

Grekova, S. et al. Activation of an antiviral response in normal but not transformed mouse cells: a new determinant of minute virus of mice oncotropism.

Results evidently demonstrated that l-theanine clearly has a pronounced effect on attention performance and reaction time response in normal healthy subjects prone to have high anxiety.

To investigate the radiation response in normal and cancerous phenotypes, along with the role and impact of p53 status, and possible correlations with pRb/p105 or other proteins involved in carcinogenesis and cell-cycle regulation, we selected two lung-derived epithelial cell lines, one normal (NL20, p53 wild-type) and one non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), H358 (known to be p53-deficient).

To compare the results of a two-point palatal discrimination response in normal subjects (n = 15), patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) [n = 15], and patients with upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS) [n = 15] matched for age, sex, and body mass index.

Moreover, active participation in PEL significantly (p < 0.04) increases the overall daily step count, duration, and MVPA heart-rate response in normal-weight boys and overweight/obese girls.

Moreover, active participation in PEL significantly (p < 0.04) increases the overall daily step count, MVPA duration, and MVPA heart-rate response in normal-weight boys and overweight/obese girls.

Active participation in PEL contributes to a significantly higher step count, exercise duration, and MVPA heart-rate response in normal-weight and overweight/obese boys (p < 0.001) and normal-weight (p < 0.001) and overweight/obese (p < 0.04) girls during school time.

Patiño, T., Soriano, J., Barrios, L., Ibáñez, E. & Nogués, C. Surface modification of microparticles causes differential uptake responses in normal and tumoral human breast epithelial cells.

Relatively low cell adhesion was observed on uncoated collagen nanofibers, whereas collagen nanofibrous matrices treated with type I collagen or laminin were functionally active in responses in normal human keratinocytes.