Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
The CVP did not differ between responding and non-responding steps in both GEF groups but attained higher values after fluid loading in non-responding than in responding steps, regardless of GEF.
Out data show that CVP increases upon fluid loading were slightly greater in non-responding than in responding steps which may also point to right ventricular dysfunction and dilatation in some of our patients with low GEF.
Indeed, GEDVI was higher prior to responding than to non-responding steps according to CI ≥10% increases when GEF was low (7 of 9 [77%] responding steps had a baseline GEDVI >850 mL/m).
Otherwise there were only 4 out of 9 responding steps remaining when defining fluid responsiveness by 15vs.10%0% CI increases, in patients with low GEF needing relatively large amounts of fluid.
Similar(51)
Israel responded stepping up its aerial bombardment, with the port of Tyre bearing the brunt.
Toyota responded, stepped up their development and joined mid-season, taking an impressive win in only their third race, in Brazil, while Audi remained committed to entering two cars to fight for the world title.
Apple at least partly responded, stepping up an existing buyback program and splitting the stock, which has gained more than 50percentt since Icahn's first announcement.
Prior to fluid loading, CVP did not differ between responding and non-responding steps and levels attained were 23 higher in the latter, regardless of GEF (P = 0.004).
The CI prior to each fluid loading step was higher in responding than non-responding steps in the low GEF group, but lower in the near-normal GEF group (Table 3).
Also, it was not lower in responding than non-responding steps according to CI ≥15% increases, in contrast to the observations that a low baseline GEDVI, albeit dependent on GEF [ 25], is more often associated with fluid responsiveness than a relatively high GEDVI [ 21, 26].
After udder stimulation, the proportion of cows responding by stepping was higher on day 1 than on all other days of testing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com