Sentence examples for responding on target from inspiring English sources
Responding on target alone trials was 8.72 and 5.47 rpm for blocks 1 and 2; these rates differed from test trial responding, F 1,15) = 15.28, p = .001.001
Responding on target alone trials was 7.86 and 8.72 rpm for blocks 1 and 2; these rates did not differ from responding to the target CSs alone, F < 1.
Responding on target alone trials was 8.78 and 8.80 rpm for blocks 1 and 2; these rates differed from test trial responding on block 1, F 1,15) = 32.63, p < .001.001
As in the superordinate A/nA tasks, subjects were better at responding on targets than at ignoring non-targets in both basic level tasks (97.2% vs. 94.0% in the Bird task, paired t-test, p = 0.005, t = 3.181, 94.7% vs. 90.5% in the Dog task; χ2, p<0.05, paired t-test, p = 0.028, t = 2.407).
Here again, subjects had a tendency to be better at responding on animal targets (go responses) than at ignoring non-targets (no-go responses) 96.4 vs. 93.1% (χ2, p<0.05, paired t-test, p = 0.054, t = 2.121).
The catch pairs were employed to ensure that participants followed the relative size rating instructions and were not simply responding based on target object display size.
Thus there was no significant effect of age on the probability of responding to targets, responding to non-targets or making random guesses (all p >.05).
In a reaction time task, participants responded to targets appearing on the left or right side of a computer screen.
Stephen did respond on Twitter when the £1m target was met: The whole situation is just breathtaking in many ways!! — Stephen's Story (@_StephensStory) April 23, 2014 In recent months the young man's campaign went from strength-to-strength with celebrities, including the former newspaper editor Piers Morgan and the stand-up comedian Jason Manford, offering their support on social media.
In Test 1 the effect of the pseudo-occasion setters on responding to the target CSs was again examined; Test 2 evaluated the effect of the pseudo-occasion setters on responding to the transfer CSs and Test 3 the effect of the target CSs on responding to the transfer CSs.
Note that participants responded more quickly on target absent trials (612 ms) than on target singleton (629 ms) or target nonsingleton (668 ms) trials.
