Exact(2)
During each iteration of the game, two participants known as the "proposer" and "responder" were asked to split an amount of money.
For example, if a first responder were asked to determine the presence or absence of a bioterrorism agent in a suspicious powder using a detection system with a high false-positive rate, he may cause unnecessary evacuation of environments suspected to be contaminated, work stoppages, and anxiety.
Similar(58)
If the answer belonged to group 2 or 3, the responder was asked which contrast agent they had used.
For example, one question was 'Does your institution have written guidelines for stress ulcer prophylaxis?' If the answer to this question was 'yes', then the responder was asked an additional series of questions concerning the details of these guidelines.
Among 12 factors frequently reported in the literature, each responder was asked to select 3 as the most important ones susceptible to explain the low prevalence of PD (Table 1).
The responder was asked to assess the following statements: My life is largely what I wanted it to be, My life is very good, I am satisfied with my life, I have achieved so far what is important for me in my life, and If I could start all over again, there is very little I would do differently.
The responder is asked to indicate on a Likert scale (0 = not at all, 2 = a bit, 3 = moderately, 4 = much, 5 = very much) how much they have felt or experienced these stated feelings or thoughts in the past week including today.
In addition, the responders were asked to add specific comments relevant to the survey topic.
The hot aches are an unpleasant experience, and responders were asked to confirm symptoms that they experience both locally to the hands and also systemically.
Responders were asked questions regarding the frequency of their religious practices, the influence religion has on their lifestyles, and their outlook on life.
Responders were asked also to return the completed survey to their EDC.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com