Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Union theorists have responded to this objection in several ways.
Although Weyl responded to this objection forcefully, and with some subtlety (Weyl, 1923a), he was able to persuade neither Einstein, nor any other leading relativity physicist, with the exception of Eddington.
Similar(58)
Again, however, Moore could respond to this objection.
There are two broad strategies in responding to this objection.
An improved version of the argument, responding to this objection, is given in Heisenberg's Chicago lectures of 1930.
Species pluralists respond to this objection by suggesting criteria for judging the legitimacy of a proposed species concept.
Intuitionists may respond to this objection by drawing on a recent version of Ewing's fitting attitude analysis of goodness.
Eliminativists often respond to this objection by first noting that the bare thesis that there are no beliefs is not itself contradictory or conceptually incoherent.
Seven years later, Butler offered a methodological argument in the "Introduction" to the Analogy that might respond to this objection if applied to morals (although Butler framed the point more generally).
One way that fictionalists can respond to this objection is to claim that it's simply irrelevant, because fictionalism does not involve the claim that there are no important disanalogies between mathematics and fiction.
To respond to this objection, contractualists must explain why 'x is wrong' and 'x is unfair' are not the sort of claims that can feature as a reason for rejecting a principle.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com