Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
DLS showed a mean size distribution of 131.8 ± 4.6 and 149.5 ± 1.7 nm in diameter for PLGem and GemPo, respectively, sizes at which increased cell internalization is known to occur [ 26].
However, the genomes of the closely related extant diploids, G. arboreum and G. raimondii, have been estimated to be 1600 and 800 Mb, respectively; sizes of those genomes and chromosomes correspond well cytologically with absolute and relative sizes of chromosomes in the G. hirsutum subgenomes.
Similar(58)
Tumors exposed to telomerase inhibitors were smaller than their control counterparts (weight: 0.49±0.31 vs. 0.58±0.16 gr' respectively, size: 0.33±0.24 vs. 0.64±0.09 cm3 respectively) with cisplatinum being synergistic with telomere shortening.
Forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) indicated the relative differences in, respectively, size and granularity of the cells.
With gyrification, telencephalic surface and weight, respectively size increase and, therefore, number of cortical neurons increase [ 16].
The proportions of women in the non-BSE and taught-BSE groups with each characteristic were respectively: size less than or equal to 2 cm 33% and 45%, T1 clinical stage 27%and42%2%, and N0 pathological stage 37% and 50%.
Instances of DBR and BRGC with different lengths (nDBR and nBRGC respectively) and sizes S are shown in Table 1.
where and denote, respectively, dilation sizes in wavenumber and frequency domains, and and denote, respectively, the sampling period in wavenumber and frequency domains.
The gaps that opened for the Ger/MoS2 and Sil/MoS2 superlattices are 24 and 7 meV, respectively (the sizes of the gaps could be well under-estimated).
Polymeric particles used include polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) resins with a density of 0.66 and 0.57 g/cm3, respectively, and sizes ranging from 116 775 μm.
For hair, blood, and urinary mercury, respectively, samples sizes were 452, 1,352, and 804 (after excluding 16, 2, and 29 persons with missing data).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com