Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Examples of η1- and η3-allyl complexes are, respectively, shown here.
Similar(58)
An XPS spectrum of GdO x shows Gd3d 3/2 and Gd3d 5/2 doublet with binding energy of 1220.5 and 1188.3 eV, respectively (not shown here).
After measuring 100 RRAM devices, the values of Vform, VSET, VRESET, and IRESET (first/second cycle) at 50% probability are found to be 1.7 V, 0.9 V, and -0.7 V, and 1.07 mA/391 μA for the 8-μm 8-μmces, andevices vandes are found those 2.5 values V, are -0.8 V, and 1.35 mA/370 μA foundhe 0.4-μm devices, respectovely (not shown here).
In total, this yielded a total of 434 peptide sequences containing validated methylated arginines and 550 peptide sequences containing validated methylated lysines with sliding window size 11(the optimal window size for both arginine and lysine is 11 after several trials of 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 and data information regarding other sliding window sizes not shown here), respectively.
These are shown here to consist, respectively, of specific residues positioned between the S1 and S2 sites, and a cluster of aromatic residues positioned below the S1 site toward the intracellular end.
As compared with siRNA control, protein levels of phosphorylated Akt and Akt after siRNA Akt were decreased by almost 70 and 60%, respectively, through quantitative analysis (data not shown here).
Importantly, KCa3.1 blockade is able to inhibit both TGFβ1-dependent and constitutive pro-fibrotic HLMF activity as shown here and in our previous study [ 30], respectively.
Shortening t1 and t2 to 200 ms and 100 ms, respectively, resulted in lower conversion of insulin of about 50%% (data not shown here).
We have shown here that human NFATC3 and NFATC4 contain six and five 5′ exons, respectively.
The PbSe and PbSe/CdSe QD samples shown here have narrow size distributions of 8.1% (b) and 6.9% (d), respectively.
For one thing, the thicknesses (estimated in SEM images, data not shown here) are 24, 29, and 36 nm in S1, S2, and S3, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com