Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
BBox, parts denote bounding-box and parts annotation respectively Methods Train phase Test phase Dim.
These quantitative results confirm that the largest improvement in precision and MCC values was observed for SMO (0.20 0.89 and 0.23 0.72, respectively) and Random Forest (0.22 0.74 and 0.31 0.60, respectively) methods.
Table 1 Thickness of AZO films simulated by SE and measured by SEM, respectively Methods 150 cycles 300 cycles 450 cycles SE (nm) 26.0 50.3 75.6 SEM (nm) 24.8 47.3 75.4 Fig. 1 Refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) were simulated by point-by-point analysis using the data from SE measurements.
DNA sequences encoding LOC and CAT domains were cloned into the yeast expression vectors p425-TEF and p426-TEF [19], respectively (Methods S1 and Tables S1 and S2).
The correlation between the combined-PI predictor and TP53 mutation status appeared to be significant (odds ratio 33.9 with 95% CI 4.8 1490.4, Fisher's Exact test p<0.001; Methods S1) and the combined-PI added significant information to TP53, tumor size and node status (analysis of deviance p = 0.035; AIC for model with and without combined-PI = 149.96 and 152.41, respectively; Methods S1).
Zebrafish fed 5 or 60 mg of Artemia per day consumed about 80 or 50% of the provided Artemia, respectively (Methods).
Similar(50)
BSmB and CySmB eluted at 11.8 min and 14.3 min, respectively (Method A).
For example, in dataset 1, RR = 0.79, 0.76, and 0.71 for low, medium and high cut-offs, respectively (Method a, PicTar targets).
When scale and shift parameters were changed to 1.0 and 0.0 respectively (method B), the imputation error rate decreased to 0.87%.
The thermal decomposition of cephalexine, cefadroxil and cefoperazone under non-isothermal conditions using the TG, respectively DSC methods, was studied.
These 3 classes are further divided into other granularity levels of 11 and 19 classes respectively (see Methods).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com