Sentence examples for respectively case from inspiring English sources

The μ and σ for the ratios of model predictions to experimental findings were 0.99 and 0.20, respectively (Case III in Table 3).

Figure 8b shows the results for the case with (D_{text{c}}) and (S_{text{H}}) values of 0.35 m and 0.8, respectively (case A2).

The diameters of the gas, condensate and water outlets are equal to 609.6, 203.2 and 203.2 mm, respectively Case 7 data validation 5000 1850 2.7 3750 3175 3500 4370 The vane-type inlet diverter has 12 curved vanes.

When (sigma_{1}) and (sigma_{3}) were 100 and 50 MPa, respectively (case A, Fig. 7a), the yield stress was negative (i.e., (mu_{0} > mu_{text{s}})) in junction elements for cases with an (S_{text{H}}) value smaller than 0.58 (gray area in Fig. 7a).

We substitute (39) into the right side of (38) to eliminate z i. Due to (39) is a piecewise function, two cases need to be considered respectively: Case 1: if z i =0, we obtain: bar lambda_{2,i}^{k + 1} = mathop {arg min }limits_{{{bar lambda }_{2,i}} in {chi_{i}}} {f_{i}}left({{{bar lambda }_{2,i}}} right).

With a median follow-up period of 120, 87 and 83 days for level 1, 2 and 3 groups, respectively, case 9 in the level 3 group showed a partial response (PR) to therapy.

Of these, 269, 253 and 235 were scored for tumour CB1IR, tumour pEGFR-IR and both parameters, respectively, cases where patient outcome was not known having been excluded.

They calculated direct and indirect costs for ambulatory ($69 and $317, respectively) and hospitalized ($428 and $460, respectively) case-patients.

In 2006 and 2007, respectively, case-fatality rates were 6.4% and 13.1% for cattle and 37.5% and 41.5% for sheep.

Among the 5,511 participants, 6.8% and 9.9% suffered a post-baseline stroke (recurrent or first-ever), depending on whether the high specificity or high sensitivity (respectively) case-identification approach was used.

The encephalitis hospitalization rate and case-fatality rate in NSW are lower than estimates from the United States (rate of 5.2 vs. 7.3/100,000/year, respectively; case-fatality rate of 4.6% vs. 7.4%, respectively); however, these differences may result in part from differences in study methods.