'respective outcome' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the individual results that each person or thing achieved. For example, “The students in the class all worked hard, and each achieved their respective outcome.”.
Post hoc calculations indicate that we had ample statistical power to detect clinically relevant associations, with ≥80% power to detect an HR >1.19 and 1.22 for our overall and progression-free survival, respectively, and ≥1.26 for each respective outcome in our analyses that were restricted to anti-EGFR treated patients.
This study compares the respective outcome of previously published repeated-exposure inhalation studies with MWCNT (Nanocyl and Baytube) in rats.
Further, the following regressors of no interest were entered to reflect the minimization procedure applied during randomization: gender, age, duration of illness, medication type, the score for the respective outcome variable at baseline, and HDRS-17 score at baseline.
We calculated rates for illegal behaviors, arrests, and convictions, where the outcome counts were the numerator and the person-time during which the respective outcome occurred was the denominator.
All comparisons were computed with a random-effects model using Review Manager (v.5.3.5, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, DK) to calculate the overall standardized mean difference of the respective outcome measures.
To avoid such confounding issues in our analysis, it is essential to control for a vast array of potential factors which simultaneously affect the respective outcome variables (i.e., predetermined variables both related to training activities as well as the skills competence variables) and the treatment variable (type of contract).
The estimates for the two standardized variables family's economic, social and cultural status, and combined PISA test score are the difference on the respective outcome variable, net of other variables in the model, for a one-standard deviation on the predictor variable.
The I1 measurement of each respective outcome was entered as covariate.
The SHRs are also given by latency, which was calculated as years between the time of first subscription to a mobile phone and the first hospital contact for the respective outcome.
Adjusted analyses were performed using linear regression models of outcome on randomised group, adjusting for baseline values of the respective outcome measure, AUDIT-C, age, education, self-efficacy, log (TOT-AL+1), EQ5D and gender.
We calculated separate quantile regression models with either BMI-SDS, fat mass index or fat-free mass index as outcome variable and the obesity-risk-allele score as explanatory variable, assessing the 0.03, 0.1, 0.2,.., 0.9, and 0.97 quantiles of the respective outcome variable.
