Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(21)
At 2% glycerol and 6-h exposure, the respective mortality percentages became 48.12 and 9.44%.
However, the respective mortality percentages in H. bacteriophora were 5.13, 14.7, and 58.83%.
Diquat was the poorest performing herbicide for P. contorta and the second poorest performing for P. mugo, inducing respective mortality rates of 2.7%and2.4%4% (Table 4).
The traditionally used herbicide diquat was the poorest performing herbicide for P. contorta and the second poorest performing for P. mugo, inducing respective mortality rates of 2.7%and2.4%4%.
However, the percentage mortality while on the respective GC protocol is very similar (5.5 vs. 6.4 %, P = 0.72, Table 2), suggesting that the reduction in period of GC is less likely to be attributed to the cohorts respective mortality.
Either an application of triclopyr alone or a mixture of triclopyr and picloram without dicamaba was significantly less effective at controlling P. contorta (inducing respective mortality of 66 and 37%) than the treatment containing triclopyr, picloram and dicamaba, where mortality was 89% (Table 4).
Similar(39)
COPD and postsurgical patients both comprised 21% of the referrals and had respective mortalities of 37% and 25%.
Respective mortalities of the Swedish patients in relation to the four levels of strata (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) of the prognostication score were 2.0%, 28.6%, 21.3%, and 33.8% (P < 0.0001 within the four levels).
Both among individuals randomized to intensive strategy, with 2.8 vs. 1.2% respective annual mortality rates, and in the standard-treatment group the same association between hypoglycemia and mortality was seen.
When reported, the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests did not indicate poor fit (i.e. there were no significant departures between the predicted probabilities and the respective observed mortality proportions).
Clinical data of 277 post-transplantation patients admitted to the ICU were collected at admission and the SAPS 3 and APACHE II score calculated with respective estimated mortality rates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com