Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Total protein content of noninfected mice treated with MFM and praziquantel (Groups B, C, and D) was comparable to the respective control group (Group A) (Table 3).
In crowded BHR and SHR, superoxide levels were either unchanged (P = 0.72) or reduced (P < 0.001), respectively, versus the respective control group; however, in SHR they were still significantly higher versus stressed WKY and BHR (P < 0.05 versus both)).
Plasma melatonin levels in treated-mice significantly increased at both times tested in compared to the respective control group (Table 1).
The fetal weights of both breeds were higher for the high energy diets compared with the respective control group on day 90 of gestation (P < 0.05).
When GSK-3 inhibitor was mediated by using FUS, there were reductive effects compared to respective control group (42.1% and 39.6% reduction compared to control, with p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 in cortex and hippocampus respectively).
Larval stress specific response was observed in terms of their nutritional (glycogen, sugar, lipid and protein) and biochemical (DNA) status compared with respective control group which were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) altered.
denote significantly different from the respective control group (P < 0.05).
Neither tactile nor laser detection thresholds differed between MB subjects and FMS patients and the respective control group (p>0.500).
Five out of seven mouse strains investigated responded with a decrease in the consumption of the sweetened solution compared to the respective control group.
Paired comparisons between FMS patients and their respective control group and MB subjects and their control group were calculated using Mann-Whitney-U-Test for independent samples.
Using a general linear model, voxel-wise gray matter differences between the patient group and the respective control group were examined using independent-sample t-tests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com