Exact(2)
Seven residents (17.5%) scored ≤30 on at least 1 personal resources questionnaire subscale.
T-scores of 40 to 59 are within the normal range; scores of ≥70 on the occupational role questionnaire or the psychologic strain questionnaire suggest significant maladaptive stress; scores of ≤30 on the personal resources questionnaire suggest a significant lack of coping skills.
Similar(58)
PRQ85-PART2: PeResourceesource Questionnaire 85-Part 2; WHO: World Health Organization The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The Personal Resource Questionnaire 85-Part 2 (PRQ85-Part 2) was used to measure the perceived social support.
Use of primary, secondary, community and social services will be obtained using a self-completed resource questionnaire administered to participants at each assessment at baseline, three months and nine months.
Analysis was performed in SPSS v20 with significance set at p < 0.05.> -wrap-foot> HADS-A or -D, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale –Anxiety or -Depression; RS, Resilience Scale; FAI, Frenchay Activities Index; SLIQ, Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire; BMI, Body Mass Index; PRQ-2000, Personal Resource Questionnaire version2000.
The Personal Resource Questionnaire PRQ-20000) measocialsupportsupport and consists of 15 statements with which the participant agrees or disagrees based on a seven-point Likert scale; higher scores indicating higher support (eg, I belong to a group in which I feel important: 1, strongly disagree to 7, strongly agree).
Composite scores are computed from responses to the home resource questionnaires and are used as a measure of family socioeconomic background in achievement comparison or for statistical control.
The research question, the type and size of the sample, and the available resources influence questionnaire design.
The quality of life instrument (SF-36 v.2) and a health resources utilization questionnaire were administered to all participants at inclusion (I1) and at the 6-month study visit (I2).
The health resources utilization questionnaire was employed for comparative analysis of the costs to the SUS of patients treated at the CRMM versus those of patients treated in other facilities.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com