Now that we have rediscovered that fighting with inadequate resources loses wars, the public is understandably fed up with the whole undertaking.
But the cost of a prolonged slump, in terms of idle resources, lost income, decaying skills and an erosion in the trust that keeps civil society going, would be far higher.
Prohibiting digging new wells, obstructing illegal wells, stopping boring bedrocks in existing wells, managing water consumption and concerning concept of virtual water are some solutions for prohibiting water resources lost in the study area.
Those who routinely used one or two of those resources lost on average 9.3 and 9.5 pounds, respectively.
All of this has real cost, in badly allocated resources, lost opportunity, and a further corrosion of the polity.
Indirect costs represent the value of economic resources lost because of disease-related work disability or premature mortality.
It is important to note that this estimate for IFF does not include resources lost due to corruption.
Indirect costs are the value of economic resources lost through disease-related work disability or premature mortality.
Indirect costs are imputed values of resources lost due to the illness, including premature deaths, patient and caregiver lost productivity, and unpaid caregiving time.
Investment in the Iodine Deficiency Prevention Programme and elimination of this problem will allow reimbursing to the budget up to 80% of financial resources lost as a result of productivity decrease.
