resource to hold

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "resource to hold" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to a resource that can be utilized or maintained, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "We need to identify a resource to hold our data securely."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Inviting researchers was also described as a valuable resource to hold workshops to engage all healthcare professionals in the implementation process of empowerment-based care.

BMC Nursing

The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer, COSMIC, (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic) was launched in 2004 as a free resource to hold and display somatic mutation data for four genes; BRAF, HRAS, KRAS and NRAS (Bamford et al, 2004).

British Journal of Cancer

The National Cancer Intelligence Network who developed the NCDR recognise these limitations and are actively seeking to address them by extending the resource to hold an enhanced cancer registry dataset and as many routine health datasets as possible.

Gut

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Polling hours vary by community, as do the resources to hold an election.

The New York Times

Jackson did not have the resources to hold Squier and the rest of the Yankees.

The New York Times

Omar Metwally, whose intensity sears through every corner of the theater, is dazzling, commanding the resources to hold in the ache of Mahmude's life, while giving himself truthfully to the freeing possibilities of a new one.

The New York Times

But that discussion does not rival the spirit and hubris we encounter when we have to convince Exit Row Steve that we have neither the time nor the resources to hold out for something sun-drenched.

The New Yorker

The easy way to be a PCC is to not make any unpopular decisions about having the resources to hold the force to account, and act like a ceremonial mayor – cutting ribbons, taking the photo opportunities and launching a few initiatives.

The Guardian

The insurers said the combined company would have the resources to hold down administrative fees for two years, saving customers $300 million; better manage drug costs to save consumers $280 million; and provide over $650 million to help the state's uninsured get access to health insurance.

The New York Times

"Copenhagen is highly involved in these programmes and took a transparent decision that the young animal in question could not contribute to the future of its species further, and given the restraints of space and resources to hold an unlimited number of animals within our network and programme, should therefore be humanely euthanised".

The Guardian

Despite the company's conservative liquidity strategy, in "highly nervous" financial markets it wanted to "remove any doubt" that the division had the resources to hold investment assets to maturity, FSA's chief executive, Robert Cochran, said in a press release.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing resources, clearly define the action you intend to take with them. Instead of using the ambiguous phrase "resource to hold", specify whether you mean to manage, maintain, or safeguard the resource. For example, "We need a resource for managing our data effectively".

Common error

Don't use "resource to hold" without clarifying the intended action. This phrase is vague and can confuse readers. Use a more precise verb to describe the resource's function, such as "resource for maintaining", "tool for controlling", or "system for managing".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "resource to hold" primarily functions as a noun phrase that is intended to identify an entity used for maintenance, storage, or control. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, this phrasing is often awkward and lacks clarity. It is better to use a more direct phrasing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "resource to hold" appears in various contexts, Ludwig AI points out that it is generally considered grammatically awkward and lacks a clear, standard meaning. With only a few examples, its frequency is rare. The phrase aims to describe something needed to manage or maintain a resource, but its vagueness often hinders effective communication. For clearer and more precise writing, it's recommended to use alternatives like "resource for maintaining" or "capacity to maintain", which specify the intended action more effectively. Using a more direct and descriptive phrase avoids ambiguity and ensures clarity in both formal and informal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

resource for maintaining

Focuses on the sustained upkeep of the resource.

resource for managing

Emphasizes the active administration and control of the resource.

means to retain

Highlights the act of keeping or preserving something.

capacity to maintain

Focuses on the ability and capability to keep something in a certain state.

capability to preserve

Highlights the ability to protect and maintain a resource.

funds for safekeeping

Refers specifically to financial resources and their protection.

ability to control

Focuses on the power and means to govern a resource.

wherewithal to safeguard

Emphasizes having the necessary means to protect a resource.

provisions for upholding

Highlights preparations and support for maintaining something.

asset for keeping

Focuses on the value and act of retaining an asset.

FAQs

What does "resource to hold" mean?

The phrase "resource to hold" is grammatically awkward and lacks a clear, standard meaning in English. It generally refers to something needed to keep or maintain a resource, but it's better to use more precise language.

How can I replace "resource to hold" in a sentence?

Consider using phrases like "resource for maintaining", "means to retain", or "capacity to maintain" depending on the intended context.

Is it grammatically correct to use "resource to hold"?

While some instances of this phrase can be found, it is generally considered grammatically awkward. It's better to use clearer, more precise language to avoid ambiguity.

What are some examples of better alternatives for "resource to hold"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases such as "tool for managing", "system for controlling", or "funds for safekeeping".