Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Data were entered twice and discrepancies were resolved with reference to the original forms.
Similar(59)
Disagreements were resolved through discussions, with reference to the total material in the transcript [ 22].
Any disagreements were resolved through discussion with reference to the original publication.
Results from the classification were compared and the differences obtained were resolved by consensus with reference to standard literature.
Disagreements in ratings were resolved by discussion, with reference to the explanatory statement for the relevant item/s, between the two raters.
Disagreements were resolved through discussion and with reference to the original article.
Differences between the researchers were resolved through discussion or with reference to a third researcher when necessary.
We had found the same categories and there was only slight disagreement on two or three of the transcripts, and those differences were resolved through discussions and with reference to the total material in the transcripts [ 15].
Any disagreement regarding inclusion was resolved through discussion or, where necessary, with reference to another reviewer (SJ).
We resolved differences in data extraction by consensus, and with reference to the original article.
With reference to quantitative measures, ddPCR technology, MIPs or MLPA and PRT, represent far more reliable and robust approaches for accurately resolving multi-allelic CNPs and should be used in preference if possible.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com