They are claimed by some philosophers to ground the possibility of value incommensurability, as in the case of constitutive incommensurability (subsection 3.2), and to help resolve value conflicts, as in the case of providing external resources for practical reason (subsection 4.4).
Traditional ways of indexing EVLW data do not resolve value dependence on physical properties or gender.
Different people will have different values, and it is very hard to resolve value-based disagreements on the basis of scientific evidence.
In his analysis of incommensurability, Fred D'Agostino discusses the role of social institutions in resolving value conflicts (2003).
A register signal, on the other hand, keeps the resolved value that it had just before the last disconnection.
The preferences of different individuals, for example, may be taken to reflect differing evaluative judgments about alternatives so that combining these different preferences into a single decision becomes analogous to resolving value conflicts in the individual case.
In addition to denying the existence of a common currency for comparison, or a governing principle (such as the utility principle), value incommensurability holds that there is no general procedure for resolving value conflicts there is not, for example, a lexical priority rule (that is, no value always has priority over another).
*All resolved values calculated from data on testing of discrepant samples.
To constrain the analysis and provide better resolved values, the ensemble of AUC data for the R3 and I1 duplexes was analyzed globally, as follows.
An impact of different Y̅ values on the resolved values of SK and mp is circumvented by setting the initial condition of the salt dissociation experiments at Pt = Ot.
These experimentally resolved values are in good agreement with hydrodynamic modeling of both the specific complex (ssp = 2.36 S, based on the IHF·DNA crystal structure) and nonspecific complex [ sns = 3.52 S, based on a structural model of IHF bound to the R3 duplex (Table 1)].
