Exact(4)
This work demonstrates that resin analysis of museum artefacts is a useful tool for both ethnographic studies and archaeological research.
This study concludes that molecular differentiation between resins from different species is still possible after a hundred years of aging in a museum environment and demonstrates the potential of resin analysis on such aged museum items.
Pyrolytic techniques for resin analysis require minimal sample (typically <500 μg/analysis), provide detailed molecular level data for individual products and, by variation of pyrolysis conditions, can provide information concerning both occluded low molecular weight components and macromolecular constituents of the sample [11].
The focus of instrumental resin analysis for archaeological research is often centered on the hafting of composite tools [7, 8], which although extremely important, has been criticised for being too dominant, leading to the exclusion of the study of other functions of such resins [9].
Similar(56)
The resin content analysis through acid digestion method ensured acceptable fiber volume fraction with void content less than 1%.
This uncommon persistence of highly hydrated states under TEM vacuum conditions [60, 75] is likely related to sample impregnation in resin prior to analysis.
Cleavage from the resin, purification, and analysis was performed as described (m/ z: calculated for C134H203N39O32S2 = 2936.5; found: 2937.8).
Cleavage from the resin, purification and analysis were performed as described above (m/ z: calculated for C145H199N37O36S1 = 3068.5; found: 3069.2).
After micro-CT scans, the extracted bone samples were fixed in a neutral 10% formaldehyde solution, and the tissue blocks were embedded in a resin for histological analysis.
Equal amounts of cell lysates were used for Ni-IDA resin pull-down analysis and the precipitates were blotted for antibodies against Kif18A and SUMO2.
SARA (saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes) analysis of the crude oil is conducted using standard method (IP-469).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com