Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(9)
Since for Wolf the demands of morality are equivalent to the demands of objective "Reason", in order to be autonomous, agents must be capable of discerning the requirements of Reason.
To this end, human nature must be shaped by a rigorous course of training so that each person's distinctive capabilities may be formed for service within a harmonious whole and in accordance with the requirements of reason.
Such reasons would be universal, non-relative, categorical requirements of reason.
The shortest accurate answer is "of reason," as in "the law of reason" or "the requirements of reason".
One version of this view (§3.3.1) holds that instrumental coherence is to be explained in terms of appropriate responses to one's beliefs about independent requirements of reason, where these beliefs could be false.
Second, Austin's work should be seen against a background where most English judges and commentators saw common-law reasoning (the incremental creation or modification of law through judicial resolution of particular disputes) as supreme, as declaring existing law, as discovering the requirements of "Reason," as the immemorial wisdom of popular "custom".
Similar(51)
According to the Transparency Account of rational requirements in general, when we point out to people that rationality requires something of them, we aren't presenting them with some requirement of reason; rather, we're pointing out to them what they already think reason requires of them.
One answer is that when one is instrumentally incoherent one violates some independent requirement of reason.
Let's suppose that there is a requirement of reason to be instrumentally coherent.
First, (§3.1) we might say that there isn't any requirement of reason to be instrumentally coherent as such, but whenever one is instrumentally incoherent, one violates some independent requirement of reason.
Second, (§3.2) we might say that there is a requirement of reason to be instrumentally coherent as such.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com