requirements in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "requirements in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to specific criteria or conditions that are included within a particular context or document. Example: "The project proposal must clearly outline the requirements in the contract to ensure all parties are aligned."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

They would also be "required to satisfy mutual obligation requirements in return for welfare payments".

The Guardian

The F.S.C. Web site (fscus.org) describes these requirements in detail.

The New York Times

The I.R.S. has tightened its requirements in recent years.

The New York Times

What are the requirements in each of the states?

The New York Times

There was great controversy over the possibility of such requirements in the major leagues.

The New York Times - Sports

CHARITY Given the suspected abuse in this area, Congress added certain requirements in recent years.

The New York Times

"However, there are a number of requirements in policy they adopted that we find troubling".

The New York Times

Europe's requirements in the field of the environment, energy infrastructures, transport and communication are common knowledge.

The Guardian - Opinion

There's lots of requirements in plays that there aren't in coffee shops".

The New York Times

Thirty-nine-year-old Tom Burris met a number of Karen's requirements in a potential husband.

The Guardian - Books

For retailers and manufacturers, conflicting requirements in the global marketplace pose a challenge.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "requirements in", ensure the context clearly defines what area or document the requirements belong to. For example, "the requirements in the contract" is clearer than simply "the requirements".

Common error

Avoid using "requirements in" without specifying the context or area the requirements belong to. This can lead to ambiguity. Instead of "meeting the requirements in," specify "meeting the requirements in the project proposal" or "meeting the requirements in the policy document".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirements in" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, specifying where certain conditions or prerequisites are located or detailed. As Ludwig AI suggests, it's used to indicate requirements within a specific context, such as a document, policy, or system.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

25%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

15%

Reference

5%

Academia

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "requirements in" is a versatile phrase used to pinpoint conditions or criteria within a specified context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's considered grammatically correct and sees frequent usage across varied domains, from News & Media to Scientific publications. The phrase serves to locate expectations within a particular setting, ensuring clear and precise communication. While generally neutral in tone, its appropriateness may vary depending on the setting, but it is perfectly usable in everyday life.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

criteria within

Changes "requirements" to "criteria", highlighting standards; preposition shifts to "within".

prerequisites within

Replaces "requirements" with "prerequisites" focusing on conditions that must be met beforehand; "within" slightly changes the spatial relationship.

stipulations included in

Replaces "requirements" with "stipulations", emphasizing explicit conditions; clarifies inclusion.

qualifications inside

Substitutes "requirements" with "qualifications", emphasizing necessary abilities or qualities; "inside" provides a different prepositional nuance.

specifications for

Replaces "requirements" with "specifications", focusing on detailed descriptions; alters preposition to "for".

provisions in

Substitutes "requirements" with "provisions", focusing on specific terms or clauses.

necessities for

Changes "requirements" to "necessities", stressing essential needs; preposition becomes "for".

conditions applicable to

Emphasizes stipulations and their relevance; changes the prepositional construction.

obligations under

Replaces "requirements" with "obligations", emphasizing duties; changes the preposition to "under".

mandates within

Replaces "requirements" with "mandates", indicating authoritative commands; preposition changes to "within".

FAQs

How can I use "requirements in" in a sentence?

Use "requirements in" to specify criteria or conditions within a particular context. For example, "The "requirements in the job description" include a master's degree and five years of experience."

What are some alternatives to "requirements in"?

Alternatives include phrases like "criteria in", "specifications for", or "conditions applicable to", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How does "requirements in" differ from "requirements for"?

"Requirements in" specifies requirements contained within something (e.g., "the requirements in the document"), while "requirements for" indicates what is needed to achieve something (e.g., "the requirements for graduation").

Is it correct to say "the requirements in place"?

Yes, the phrase "the requirements in place" is grammatically correct and commonly used to describe established rules or conditions. However, be mindful that there may be "regulations in effect" that have a similar meaning, and may be better suited depending on context.