Sentence examples for requirements at issue from inspiring English sources

The work requirements at issue Friday would have fundamentally changed the food stamp program for many adult recipients.

"These proposed regulations would eliminate the ITAR requirements at issue in this case," the department spokesman said.

After all, the campaign disclosure requirements at issue here were enacted by Congress (as key post-Watergate reforms after President Richard Nixon's personal lawyer Herbert Kalmbach went to prison for paying hush money to potential witnesses out of secret cash campaign contributions).

In McConnell v. FEC (2003), the Court reaffirmed that campaign finance disclosure is not comparable to the membership disclosure requirements at issue in the NAACP case.

Although, strictly speaking, the only question before us is whether respondent may be punished for failing to comply with the statutory requirement at issue, 12 I am constrained to add that I cannot agree with the California Supreme Court's conclusion that the requirement may be enforced if the State is merely precluded from using the compelled evidence and its fruits in a criminal prosecution.

For a curve of the type in question to reach Σ0 it must intersect H+ Σ0), but once it reaches H+ Σ0) it can be continued endlessly into the past without meeting Σ0 because the generators of H+ Σ0) are past endless null geodesics that never meet Σ0.[14] This difficulty can be overcome by weakening the requirement at issue by rephrasing it in terms of timelike curves rather than causal curves.

Accordingly, the authors argue that the "at issue" requirement of Simmons serves no real purpose and should be eliminated.

I choose "at issue" deliberately.

The volitional-conduct requirement is not at issue in most direct-infringement cases; the usual point of dispute is whether the defendant's conduct is infringing (e.g., Does the defendant's design copy the plaintiff's?), rather than whether the defendant has acted at all (e.g., Did this defendant create the infringing design?).

Most recently in Citizens United, Justice Scalia joined the court's 8-to-1 ruling upholding disclosure requirements in the statute at issue.

Earthquake safety was never at issue: Requirement 10 had to do only with fire precautions.