Sentence examples for requirement at issue from inspiring English sources

For a curve of the type in question to reach Σ0 it must intersect H+ Σ0), but once it reaches H+ Σ0) it can be continued endlessly into the past without meeting Σ0 because the generators of H+ Σ0) are past endless null geodesics that never meet Σ0.[14] This difficulty can be overcome by weakening the requirement at issue by rephrasing it in terms of timelike curves rather than causal curves.

In McConnell v. FEC (2003), the Court reaffirmed that campaign finance disclosure is not comparable to the membership disclosure requirements at issue in the NAACP case.

I choose "at issue" deliberately.

Most recently in Citizens United, Justice Scalia joined the court's 8-to-1 ruling upholding disclosure requirements in the statute at issue.

Decisional privacy and the requirements of autonomy are also at issue in the debate over the legitimacy of parental consent for the genetic testing of minors for late-onset conditions (Clayton 1997b; Cohen 1998; Sevick et al. 2005).

At issue is a requirement for the installation in each cab of a high-tech system that permits credit card payments, has a touch-screen monitor that lets passengers watch television and follow their ride on an electronic map, and includes a global positioning device, which tracks the cabs' travels.

At issue, the mayor said, are requirements that Off-Track Beturng turn over an increasing share of its revenues to the state and the racing industry.

At issue was the legality of a requirement that same-sex married couples must live in Canada for one year before seeking divorce.

"The licensed notice at issue here is not an informed-consent requirement or any other regulation of professional conduct," Thomas wrote.

In examining whether Congress was addressing a demonstrated "pattern of unconstitutional employment discrimination by the states," the Court gives superficial treatment to the requirement that we "identify with some precision the scope of the constitutional right at issue".

At issue is a provision of the landmark 1996 law that reduces the numerical work requirements for states as they move more and more people from welfare to work.