required to provide

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "required to provide" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating an obligation or necessity to supply something, often in formal or legal contexts. Example: "All employees are required to provide their identification before entering the building."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They were not required to provide proof.

Independent

Isn't he required to provide this list?

The New York Times

It is voluntary: employers aren't required to provide retirement benefits.

The New York Times

H.M.O.'s are are not required to provide the information.

The New York Times

You are not required to provide Feedback.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

All universities that charge fees are required to provide bursaries.

The Guardian

Students may be required to provide proof of birth date.

Stanford University

Electricity is required to provide illumination continuously for 24 h.

Building and Environment

Time Warner would be required to provide equivalent services to all channels.

The New York Times

Under the Senate bill, insurers would be required to provide the coverage.

The New York Times

American diplomats are not required to provide legal assistance to residency holders.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "required to provide" in legal or formal writing, ensure the requirement is clearly defined, specifying who is obligated and what must be provided.

Common error

Avoid using "required to provide" in excessively passive constructions that obscure who is imposing the requirement. Instead, clearly state the entity enforcing the requirement to maintain clarity and accountability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "required to provide" functions as a verb phrase indicating obligation or necessity. Ludwig's examples demonstrate its use in various contexts, where an entity is compelled to supply something.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "required to provide" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that indicates an obligation or necessity to supply something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it appears across varied contexts, from news and media to scientific and academic publications. While the phrase is generally acceptable, one should be mindful of avoiding excessive passive voice. Understanding its function and purpose allows for more effective communication in formal and professional settings. Consider alternatives like "obligated to provide" or "mandated to supply" depending on the specific context to ensure clarity and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obligated to provide

Replaces "required" with "obligated", emphasizing a sense of duty or compulsion.

compelled to furnish

Substitutes "required" with "compelled" and "provide" with "furnish", suggesting a strong enforcement to supply.

mandated to supply

Replaces "required" with "mandated" and "provide" with "supply", indicating an official or legal order.

duty-bound to give

Expresses a moral or legal obligation to offer something.

under an obligation to submit

Highlights the formal responsibility to present or deliver something.

legally bound to offer

Focuses on the legal aspect of the obligation to present something.

expected to render

Replaces "required" with "expected" and "provide" with "render", suggesting an anticipated act of supplying something.

contractually obligated to deliver

Emphasizes the binding nature of a contract to supply something specific.

responsible for submitting

Highlights the accountability associated with providing or delivering something.

shall be responsible to present

Uses formal language to indicate a future responsibility to provide.

FAQs

How can I use "required to provide" in a sentence?

You can use "required to provide" to indicate an obligation or necessity to supply something. For example, "All applicants are "required to provide" proof of residency".

What are some alternatives to "required to provide"?

You can use alternatives like "obligated to provide", "mandated to supply", or "compelled to furnish" depending on the context.

Is there a difference between "required to provide" and "expected to provide"?

"Required to provide" indicates a strict obligation, often legal or contractual, while "expected to provide" suggests a less formal anticipation or expectation. The former carries more weight and consequence.

When is it appropriate to use "required to provide" in formal writing?

It is appropriate to use "required to provide" in formal writing, such as legal documents, official guidelines, or academic papers, where a clear and binding obligation needs to be expressed. It is suitable when something must be furnished or delivered without exception.