required not to exceed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "required not to exceed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where there is a limit or maximum that must not be surpassed, often in legal, technical, or formal documents. Example: "The total weight of the cargo is required not to exceed 500 kilograms."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

In order to guarantee global convergence, the measure of constraint violation in each iteration is required not to exceed a progressively decreasing limit.

Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics

In our framework, we assumed a limited power budget at each transmitter, and because it is a cognitive scenario, the introduced interference to the primary user was required not to exceed a predetermined tolerated threshold.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

In our model, the amount of collagen was required not to exceed the existing amount of damage in the same patch.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Further we tried to impose some truncation limit for stabilized weights requiring them not to exceed levels of 10, 20, and 50 also with very similar results.

BMC Psychiatry

The drawback is that a minimum amount of electrolyte is required in order not to exceed 4 M Si content, which otherwise leads to a gelation of the electrolyte.

Electrochimica Acta

This requires each team not to exceed a certain total payroll.

The New York Times

This means that requiring the prevalence not to exceed 2.1% of the initial population has no robustness against model uncertainty.

BMC Public Health

Interpretation Our findings underscore the care required by the primary operator not to exceed the dose constraint of 10 mSv per year.

Acta Orthopaedica

"Acesulfame potassium... may be safely used as a general-purpose sweetener and flavor enhancer in foods generally, except in meat and poultry, in accordance with current good manufacturing practice and in an amount not to exceed that reasonably required to accomplish the intended technical effect in foods".

Huffington Post

This approach requires the cumulative, post-development bed load transport volume not to exceed the pre-development amount for the 2-year recurrence interval.

Applied Water Science

–Jumbo mortgage loans (more than $417,000 nationally, not to exceed $729,750 in high-house-price places) are often required to buy a house in urban blue states.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "required not to exceed", ensure clarity by specifying the units of measurement or context to which the limit applies. For instance, "The temperature is required not to exceed 25 degrees Celsius" provides a clear and measurable constraint.

Common error

Avoid using "required not to exceed" without providing a clear reference point or unit of measurement. For example, stating "Costs are required not to exceed" is incomplete; it should be clarified as "Costs are required not to exceed $1000 per unit".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "required not to exceed" functions as a modifier, specifying a condition that must be met. As Ludwig AI confirms, it expresses a mandatory limitation or upper boundary. It is often used in technical, legal, and formal contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "required not to exceed" is grammatically correct and functions to specify a mandatory upper limit or boundary. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is usable in written English and often appears in technical, formal, and legal documents. Analysis of usage patterns reveals that it commonly appears in scientific documents, news articles, and wiki articles. Though the expression is perfectly fine and correct to use, alternatives such as "must not go beyond" or "is limited to" might provide a more nuanced or precise expression, depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

must not go beyond

Emphasizes the action of surpassing a limit, instead of the requirement itself.

should stay within

Suggests remaining inside a defined boundary rather than just not exceeding it.

is limited to

Focuses on the restriction or cap imposed on something.

cannot be greater than

Uses a more formal and mathematical tone to express the upper limit.

is obliged to be under

Emphasizes the obligation to remain below a certain level.

has to be less than or equal to

Specifies a precise upper boundary including the possibility of being equal.

is constrained not to surpass

Highlights the constraint that prevents exceeding a value.

is mandated to be below

Stresses the mandatory nature of staying under a threshold.

is under an obligation not to exceed

Highlights the binding commitment to not surpass a certain limit.

needs to remain under

Emphasizes the necessity to stay below a specified value.

FAQs

How can I use "required not to exceed" in a sentence?

Use "required not to exceed" when you need to express a mandatory upper limit. For example, "The project budget is required not to exceed $50,000." It indicates that going over this limit is not permitted.

What are some alternatives to the phrase "required not to exceed"?

Alternatives include "must not go beyond", "is limited to", or "cannot be greater than". The best choice depends on the context and desired level of formality.

Is it correct to say "required to not exceed" instead of "required not to exceed"?

While both are understandable, "required not to exceed" is the more standard and grammatically preferred construction. Placing "not" before "to" maintains the proper negation of the verb "exceed".

What's the difference between "required not to exceed" and "should not exceed"?

"Required not to exceed" indicates a strict, mandatory limit, whereas "should not exceed" suggests a recommendation or guideline. The former implies a stricter consequence for exceeding the limit.