Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

required information needed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "required information needed" is redundant and not ideal in written English. It can be used in contexts where emphasis on necessity is needed, but it's better to avoid redundancy. An example could be: "Please submit the required information needed for the application." Alternative expressions include "necessary information" and "essential information."

Wiki

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The Event Completion Tips are the required information needed to activate your event.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The HMAG then configures the required routing information needed to reach MN.

As illustrated in Figure 2, the required channel information needed can be obtained in three steps shown in Figure 2b for the switching pattern in Figure 2a.

It was found that the film thickness that had the maximum rms roughness via surface roughening provides the required thickness information needed for fabricating the low-stress PZT cantilever.

Overall, with 80.5% of the required information size, the number needed to treat was 37 patients (95% confidence interval: number needed to treat is >18 and the number needed to harm is >297) for the comparison of albumin with control fluid excluding trials at high risk of bias.

Overall, with 79.9% of the required information size, the number needed to treat was 38 patients (95% confidence interval: the number needed to treat is >18, and the number needed to harm is >251) for the comparison of albumin with crystalloid fluid.

Overall with only 2.2% of the required information size, the number needed to treat was 10 patients (95% confidence interval: the number needed to treat is >4 and the number needed to harm is >19) for the comparison of albumin with colloid fluid, excluding studies at high risk of bias.

Overall, with 85.6% of the required information size, the number needed to treat was 37 patients (95% confidence interval: the number needed to treat is >18, and the number needed to harm is >517) for the comparison of albumin with control fluid.

Overall, with 78.9% of the required information size, the number needed to treat was 37 patients (95% confidence interval: the number needed to treat is >18, and the number needed to harm is to >297) for the comparison of albumin with crystalloid fluid, after excluding trials at high risk of bias.

Overall, with 5.8% of the required information size, the number needed to harm was 172 patients (95% confidence interval: the number needed to harm is >9, and the number needed to treat is >10) for the comparison of albumin with colloid fluid.

In this task, participants seemed to follow an online information-acquisition strategy to save working memory costs (i.e., looking back to the required information right before the information is needed).

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal writing, prefer "information required" over "required information needed" for a more streamlined effect.

Common error

Avoid using "required information needed" repeatedly in a single document, as it can sound redundant and unprofessional. Vary your language by using synonyms like "essential data" or simply "the necessary details".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

69%

Authority and reliability

3.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "required information needed" functions as a descriptor, specifying the type of information that is necessary in a given context. As Ludwig indicates, this phrase can be improved by using more concise alternatives. Examples of use are in wikis, science, news articles, and media.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Wiki

30%

Science

30%

News & Media

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "required information needed" isn't grammatically incorrect, Ludwig highlights its redundancy. It's often better to use shorter and more direct alternatives such as "necessary information" or "essential information". The phrase appears across various contexts, including Wiki articles, scientific publications, and news media, suggesting a neutral register. Using stronger synonym alternatives like "indispensable information" may result in more refined professional discourse.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "required information needed"?

You can use phrases like "necessary information", "essential information", or "information required" for conciseness and clarity.

Is "required information needed" grammatically correct?

While not strictly incorrect, "required information needed" is somewhat redundant. It's generally better to opt for a more concise phrase like "necessary information".

When is it appropriate to use "required information needed"?

You might use "required information needed" when you want to emphasize the absolute necessity of the information, but in most cases, simpler phrasing suffices. Using a term as "essential data" can be a good idea.

What's the difference between "required information" and "required information needed"?

"Required information" is a clear and direct way to state that certain information is necessary. Adding "needed" to "required information" intensifies the sense of requirement but can make the phrase sound less professional. Prefer "necessary details" for a more concise alternative.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

69%

Authority and reliability

3.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: