Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(44)
Still, we require proof that it has happened.
For one thing, removing Mr Estrada would require proof that the allegations against him were true.
The law does not require proof that the suspect intended to carry out the plot.
The law does not require proof that the bias was deliberate.
The act doesn't require proof that anyone believed or was deceived by the false claim.
Appeals courts typically say they require proof that a judge's factual determinations were "clearly erroneous" to overturn them.
Similar(10)
Instead, the law requires proof that repaying the loan would produce "an undue hardship".
The law requires proof that the shootings were intended to "intimidate the civilian population at large".
The statute authorizing the sanctions requires proof that the bank official acted "willfully".
But he declared that he wanted to stick with the stricter standard requiring proof that discrimination was intentional.
Judge Roush said the insanity defense required proof that Mr. Malvo was categorically incapable of making the distinction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com