Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Flexible relational encoding/retrieval was often assessed with tests of episodic memory that require consciousness of retrieval, while rigid non-relational encoding/retrieval was often assessed with priming tests that do not require consciousness of retrieval.
These preserved memory abilities do not require consciousness of encoding and retrieval and are supported by extra-hippocampal brain regions.
Similar(58)
Depending on how we take this claim, of course, Herder may not be saying anything with which Kant would disagree: Kant more than anyone else argues that all experience of an object requires consciousness of a concept as well as of empirical intuitions of that object, the matter of which is sensation.
Even if they think that consciousness is inseparable from some sort of mental reflexivity, they do not suggest that consciousness can, so to speak, be analyzed into mental parts, none of which themselves essentially require consciousness.
Consciousness (of the appropriate sort) may be sufficient for (but underived from) intentionality, and yet, intentionality does not require consciousness.
It requires consciousness instead of blood and genes.
If it were established that only trace conditioning requires consciousness, then the presence or absence of trace conditioning, and of the mechanisms which underlie it, could be used as evidence as to whether other animals are conscious.
Since it is not plausible that mere meta-representation requires consciousness, Hampton's study invites an important question: what kind of metamemory is good evidence for consciousness?
It is in "myself inasmuch as I am only a thinking thing" (ibid).; that is, in myself as a whole — which requires unified consciousness of myself as a whole.
A theory of consciousness requires an explanation of how and why some brain process causes consciousness replete with all the features we commonly experience.
It is this type of action that is required to change the consciousness of the American people.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com