How would we require an asserting entity to prove they are an operating company?
A governmental entity may access, or may require a covered entity to provide, prospectively or retrospectively, location information regarding a mobile communications device only with a warrant issued based on a showing of probable cause.
gBut it may require a correlation entity to handle the filtering tasks among all messaging servers.
This approach does not require a correlation/coordination entity for filtering messages.
It should not require a central entity, but it can assume the availability of large scale fading information to surrounding receivers.
In the U.S., most urban planning projects require a government entity to issue a request for proposals to redesign a public space, but in Tijuana, these are changes are largely motivated by the architects themselves.
If this were not so, every entity would be dispensable (due to a theorem of Craig).[3] What we require for an entity to be 'dispensable' is for it to be eliminable and that the theory resulting from the entity's elimination be an attractive theory.
SeeNat'l Cable Television Ass'n v. FCC, 33 F.3D.C. (D.CirCir. 1994) (concluding that the FCC "reasonably interpreted the Act to require that an entity obtain a cable franchise only when that entity selects or provides the video programming to be offered").
Many support entities require an incubation process.
Animals and robots perceiving and acting in a world require an ontology that accommodates entities, processes, states of affairs, etc., in their environment.
Educational entities require an analyst to research and compile data using printed, electronic and online resources and assist in preparing for hearings.
