Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
For six years, Democrats in the Senate have chafed at an unprecedented abuse of the filibuster by Republicans, who have used the practice to hold up nominees high and low and require a supermajority for virtually every bill.
They want to reinterpret the Constitution to require a supermajority for confirmation.
"A fine day to have that". Yet Hatch appeared on the floor and gave a sharp, emphatic speech, insisting that the Constitution does not require a "supermajority" for judicial confirmations -- a reference to the 60 votes needed to stop a filibuster.
But there's a very strong originalist argument that if the Founding Fathers had intended to require a supermajority for the Senate to act (whether on presidential nominations or on legislation itself), then they would have clearly included it in the Constitution.
Similar(56)
Democrats are considering rewriting Senate rules so Republicans cannot require a supermajority of 60 votes for judicial or cabinet-level nominees, or both.
But it would prevent Republicans from being able to require a supermajority of 60 votes for the confirmation of presidential appointees to cabinet-level or other executive branch positions.
Here's the last one for today: Why not require a supermajority of votes within the Supreme Court to overturn a law?
They may be renewed, but only once, and such renewals require a supermajority of parliament.
Here's how.
The committee requires a supermajority for decisions, 12 of the 15 votes, so the dealers can't gang up on the other members.
(Later amendments required a supermajority for allowing insurrectionist legislators to serve in government again, and deciding whether the President remains unfit to execute his office after a period of disability).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com