Sentence examples for reproducibility of work from inspiring English sources

In an unusual attempt at scientific self-examination, psychology researchers are scrutinizing the reproducibility of work in their field.

In a paper published posthumously in 2001, Frank Sibley evokes the longstanding controversy surrounding the reproducibility of works of art and contends that in this regard a "two-way pull" is a pervasive feature of the practices and discourses of art.

To explore the reproducibility of prior work, here we present results from a three-laboratory study, the objectives of which were to determine the mean and variability in test endpoints (i.e., adult fecundity, egg hatchability, and juvenile growth) under baseline conditions and to identify the sources of variability.

We could do this comparison only for SentiStrength and VADER, which kindly allowed the entire reproducibility of their work, sharing both methods and datasets.

A clarification of this discrepancy would improve the reproducibility of the work.

These studies were performed two independent times to verify the reproducibility of the work under a protocol reviewed and approved by the University of Michigan Committee on Use and Care of Animals (UCUCA).

A shift from polyclonal antibodies towards sustainable reagents like monoclonal or recombinant antibodies or histone binding domains would help to improve the reproducibility of experimental work in this field.

Peer review is the lynchpin of the publishing system: encouraging the community to consciously (and conscientiously) uphold these principles should help to improve published papers, increase confidence in the reproducibility of the work and, ultimately, provide strategic benefits to authors and their institutions.

However, keeping the recent development of genetic engineering and its product (used in day to day life e.g., Insulin, BT Cotton, and many more..) in mind, I think this figure should be more than that mentioned by authors, even though the authors are very much correct about the reproducibility of scientific work.

Whilst this circumvented the need for us to acquire different datasets from separate organisations, and would aid future reproducibility of the work, EPER data from the first reporting year (2001) are known not to be fully comprehensive for all facilities in all countries [ 10].

I understand that demanding each and every search detail will make research inefficient; however, there are relatively simple steps to ensure reproducibility of searches: working with (and specifying) a fixed dataset/database of known date/version, providing thresholds for searches and other settings for programs, and showing as many results of these searches as possible.