Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Using the general approach to representing personality constructs suggested by Bagozzi and Heatherton (1994), 25 measurement models were tested.
MotB is far more serious, and while the companions fulfill the role of representing personality extremes, none of them are particularly entertaining company.
Each subject also completed a questionnaire composed of 67 multiple-choice questions with binary variables representing personality characteristics and physiologic symptoms.
The ten rating scales representing personality disorders have previously been used in two studies, one of inter-rater agreement of personality disorders [ 14], and one of convergent validity of personality disorders [ 20].
Binary variables representing personality characteristics and physiological symptoms were constructed using the response categories of the questions in the questionnaire, which consisted of 67 multiple-choice questions (see Additional file 7).
A secondary purpose of the study is to assess the latent dimensions underlying the relationship between self-reported traits representing personality disorder and observer reported traits representing the same personality disorders.
Similar(53)
67 multiple-choice questions to represent personality characteristics and physiological symptoms were included in the questionnaire.
Persistence, conscientiousness, or agreeableness might represent personality traits that would be interesting to explore in this regard.
Personality was assessed by the Personality Outlook Profile Scale (POPS) [ 19], a brief measure of personality which represents personality phenotypes which may contribute to successful aging.
This is a brief self- and informant-report measure of personality which represents personality phenotypes which may contribute to successful aging.
However, even these instruments might suffer from acquiescence when they use desirable and undesirable poles to represent personality factors, for example, for agreeableness cordial as one descriptor and harsh as opposite descriptor (Rammstedt et al., 2004; see also Denissen et al., 2008).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com