Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The idea is that if the representations I can attribute to myself possess a unity of the right kind, and if I apprehend or am cognitively sensitive to this unity, then I will be able to represent the apperceiving subject of any one of them as identical with that of any other.
The only plastic representations I can think of at all, off-hand, are the Hitler dolls and marionettes in Syberberg's film Hitler: A Film from Germany, and Maurizio Cattelan's "Praying Hitler," which were made decades after the Primate of Linz ate the gun in his bunker.
Similar(58)
I always try to find the simplest representation I can of whatever story I'm trying to tell about the economy.
Yet if, on the one hand, I had representations that I could not relate in some way to an objective world, then I could not accompany those representations with "I think" or recognize them as my representations, because I can say "I think…" about any given representation only by relating it to an objective world, according to the argument just discussed.
This network admits six different Tree of Complexes representations: (i) functional group H can be connected to either B or C; (ii) any interconnection pattern that spans groups E, F, and G can be chosen.
If I know there is someone who has not had any kind of representation, then I can be pretty sure they have been put through some kind of torture.
So, from the outset I must declare that I have some sympathy with patient representation, but I can also see some problems and pitfalls.
The essential technical achievement was that all semi-decidable (recursively enumerable) sets can be given a Diophantine representation, i.e., they can be represented by a simple formula of the form ∃x1…∃xn(s = t), where (s = t) is a Diophantine equation.
After the image representation, each image I can be represented by a B L -dimensional signature in real-valued domain (R^{B^{L}}).
Kant affirms that I have no inner intuition of the subject (e.g. B157), and this claim would conflict with the subject's being a collection of representations, since he holds that I can intuit my representations by inner sense (e.g. A33/B49).
These are some of the most advanced facial representations I've seen, and you can pick out individual hairs and the shine on the buttons on their jackets.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com