Therefore, a higher home delivery rate and less ANC are parts of the explanation (but do not represent the whole explanation).
Amplification may represent the best explanation, in that amplification of the MET genomic region, 7q31, has been observed in the Progenetix CGH Database in 23% of colorectal cancers [ 22] Most of the assays in the OncoCarta panel did not detect mutations or the frequency of mutations was very low (below 1%) in our colon cancer samples.
There are direct positive relations between adiposity and circulating estrogens [ 10], and between adult weight gain and postmenopausal breast cancer risk [ 11], and circulating endogenous hormones represent the primary explanation for this positive relation between adiposity and postmenopausal breast cancer incidence [ 12].
Differences in the strength of family ties across linguistic groups represent the most reasonable explanation for such differences.
The lack of a change in middle Holocene hydrology and the spatiotemporally heterogeneous nature of the Quercus-Pinus transition on the ACP indicate prehistoric anthropogenic land management practices may represent the most parsimonious explanation for the regionally pervasive ecological change.
These predictions represent the only possible explanations of the associated experimental observations and (or) the topology of the network model.
Differences in methods, sample size, and stage of the disease again represent the most obvious explanations of these discrepancies, but the results from the three studies indicate that the possible prognostic value of miRNA-126 remains to be further clarified.
The genomic profiles and histologic study of our aberrant normal samples support the conclusion that tumor cell contamination rather than genetic field cancerization represents the likeliest explanation for clinically observed local recurrence rates up to 20%% following BCS despite post-operative breast radiotherapy.
Corpuscles represent the lowest level of explanation that is possible within a mechanical account of bodies.
Each of these seven summated rating scales was measured independently of each other, hence every participant had seven unique scores, one for each type of explanation, representing the extent that explanation was endorsed across the seven evolution scenarios.
