Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Given these ambiguous literature reports, we compared the results of four independent studies which examined the effect of stimulus frequency at a fixed temperature: Cameron et al. [ 34] and Nobe et al. [ 3] on isolated papillary muscles, Zhang et al. [ 6] on isolated LV trabeculae, and Ren and Davidoff [ 39] on isolated single myocytes.
In this report, we compare the ensemble results of two aerosol transport models with SPM data.
In this report we compare the effects of amino acid substitutions within this coiled-coil region on structure and function of both viral envelope proteins and the corresponding synthetic peptides.
In this report we compare the mapping efficiency of reads of different length.
In this report, we compare the transcriptome profiles of week 4 (early) vs. week 13 (late/mature) TB lung granulomas of rhesus macaques.
In this report, we compare the global expression profiles of three E. faecalis strains during growth in human urine in vitro.
In this report, we compare the diagnostic performance of the Global Focus microscope to a conventional fluorescence microscope (Nikon E400, Melville, NY) for the detection of M. tuberculosis bacilli from sputum smears obtained from clinical specimens.
In the present report we compare the assay performance of the above-mentioned methods, in terms of practicability, to bacterial culture.
In this report, we compare the original sample (numbered surveys) and the additional sample (non-numbered surveys) in terms of overall response rate, the proportion of explicit refusals, and the distributions of survey variables among the respondents.
In this report, we compare the effects of two different recruitment strategies in terms of their efficiency, the characteristics of the patients who respond, and their responses to treatment.
In this report, we compare the performances of various nonpenalized and penalized methods in the prediction of diseases on data from Korea Association Resource (KARE) project that is a part of Korea Genome Epidemiology Study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com