Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Quality of reports was assessed by the fulfilment of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial (CONSORT) items.
Symptom reports were assessed with repeated measures mixed hierarchical modeling.
Reports were assessed during the routinely performed morning meeting by a panel of in house radiologists.
Reports were assessed for documentation of 15 key reporting features and a subset of 5 features was assessed for accuracy.
They said although intelligence reports were assessed quickly very few were acted upon.
Multiple reports for a single trial were linked and data from all relevant reports was assessed.
Finally, the association of "reverse lags" of weather variables (e.g. the association of temperature in the t days after norovirus reports) was assessed.
Only information published in the trial reports was assessed.
Methodological quality of original reports was assessed through QUADAS tool.
Only one included report was assessed as "adequate" on all domains (supplementary table C), 14 and only two reports were assessed as "adequate" for blinding.
The papers and reports were assessed for relevance, and information about potential features was extracted.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com