Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
To minimise publication bias, all studies with adequate reporting were included, whether full-text articles, dissertations, abstracts, conference presentations or other unpublished data that had undergone some form of peer-review.
When only herds with good reporting were included in the FRD, the completeness decreased (Table 4).
In order to minimize misunderstanding and ambiguity, specific explanations were added for each sub-item, and examples of 'good reporting' were included.
Similar(57)
Only variables that are clearly and accurately reported were included in the analyses.
Only factors that are accurately reported were included in the analyses [ 14- 18].
Data from the entire pre- and post-intervention periods, or as much as reported, were included.
Only patients with biomarker and survival data reported were included in the analysis, totaling 303 patients.
A discussion on the classification made and the works reported is included.
All polyphenols for which content values in foods have been reported are included.
References to the publications where protein-protein interactions and consensus binding sites were reported are included.
Any site of the body where pain was reported was included within the review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com