Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Data on sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding and outcome reporting were extracted for each retention trial to assess risk of bias.
Similar(59)
Data regarding the study designs and outcomes reported were extracted.
Data on background characteristics (participants, study purpose, sample size, design, scales reported) were extracted for each study.
The time and date that each case was reported was extracted from NBSS.
Aggregated data for analysis by the staff engaged in quantitative reporting are extracted in pseudonymised form.
Essential details of included reports were extracted using a simple data extraction form.
As explained in the Results section, data from other reports were extracted and used for sensitivity analyses.
These reports were extracted and pooled for analysis.
Data from trial registry reports were extracted by one observer and checked by a second.
The unit costs of different services from the various studies and government reports were extracted.
Arguments in study reports were extracted by two reviewers independently (JB and MW).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com