Sentence examples for reporting treatment from inspiring English sources

Method of data collection should be considered when reporting treatment outcomes.

The purpose of these recommendations is to provide a standard format for reporting treatment results and standardised epidemiologic data after aortic vascular graft infection to improve the comparison of clinical outcomes between different therapeutic approaches and different study populations.

There is an increasing body of literature reporting treatment failure of the currently recommended radical treatment of Plasmodium vivax infections.

Reporting treatment outcomes of patients enrolled in ART programs is important to demonstrate program effectiveness and justify continued funding, while assessment of factors associated with outcomes can help to identify opportunities for program improvement [2], [3].

Systematic literature review identified studies reporting treatment outcomes in minority patients electing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

Studies reporting treatment of HPS with liver transplantation or other interventional nonmedical therapies were excluded.

A total of 64 studies (32 for initial treatment and negative culture, 28 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 24 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods) and 21 RCTs met all inclusion criteria (14 for initial treatment and negative culture, 8 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 8 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods).

Pair-wise differences between treatment groups in the proportion of patients reporting treatment-emergent adverse events were compared via chi-square tests.

There were no statistically significant pair-wise treatment differences between the treatment groups in the proportion of patients reporting treatment-emergent adverse events.

Owing to the retrospective nature of the studies reporting treatment-related side effects, most reviewed studies were subject to some level of biases such as selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, and/or detection bias.

While the proportion of patients reporting treatment-related AEs was greater in the NEPA group compared with APR + PALO, the incidence was relatively low in both groups (10.1% versus 5.8%), with constipation being the only AE exceeding 1% (3.6% versus 1.0%).