Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
Reporting is in accordance with proposed guidelines for the reporting of reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS).
The literature on reproducibility of the clinical hip examination in patients with hip OA is limited and heterogeneous but recently the first set of guidelines on the reporting of reliability and agreement studies was published [ 33].
These tests are not present in this review, so that, in latest analysis, our study could be considered as a literature review of accuracy of lumbar clinical tests with additional reporting of reliability information.
The objective of this literature review was to assess the methods used for diagnosis (primarily the accuracy with additional reporting of reliability of these tests) of the clinical tests for lumbar instability in individuals with LBP and investigate their applicability in daily practice.
Similar(56)
Additionally, most of the included instruments had limited reports of reliability and validity testing.
Lastly, this study comprised three reviewers and 29 papers reporting studies of reliability in the area of physical medicine.
These include the need for research to have been conducted ethically, the consideration of relevance to inform practice or policy, the use of appropriate and rigorous methods, and the clarity, coherence of reporting, address of reliability, validity, and objectivity [5].
The objectives here were to review the reporting of interrater reliability when studies use comorbidity indices in clinical research publications and to report the interrater reliability of four common indices in a particular research setting.
One approach to enhance diagnostic accuracy in BD research is through the establishment and reporting of interrater reliability (IRR).
For calculation of CT-PAQ scores, we excluded walking, since Chasan-Taber et al. reported lack of reliability for this item (4).
As displayed in Table 2, 62%% (N = 18) of the studies reported estimates of reliability and/or validity of the used instruments, including internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability, specificity, and sensitivity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com