Sentence examples for reporting inclusion from inspiring English sources

Results Respondents reporting inclusion of any selected lower-fat food had significantly lower fat intake (P<.01) than exclusive high-fat users (male respondents: 31.5% vs 35.1%; female respondents: 30.3% vs 34.4%; children: 30.6% vs 33.4%).

The reporting of inclusion and exclusion criteria within the included studies was generally poor, with two studies not reporting inclusion criteria [ 7, 18] and only one study reporting any exclusion criteria [ 14].

These included an absence of control groups in any of the studies; lack of clarity in reporting inclusion and exclusion criteria; the duplication of patients between studies; and lack of detail in the conference abstracts.

Only one study reports inclusion of patients with thoracic aneurysms [12].

Most (n = 61) were excluded because they did not comply with RCT quality criteria or did not report inclusion criteria or patient severity (n = 22).

Trials that did not clearly report inclusion and exclusion criteria were excluded, as were those that did not comply with standard RCT quality criteria (e.g., appropriate research questions, randomization, blinding when relevant and inclusion/exclusion process) [5] or were not published in peer-reviewed journals [1 3, 6 21].

Table 1 reports inclusion and exclusion criteria.

All 7 laboratories reported inclusion of many different breeds.

Ninety-one studies (48.9%) reported inclusion of a statistician on their study team, and 83 (44.6%) reported inclusion of an epidemiologist or clinical trials methodologist.

Fewer than half of the studies reported inclusion of a statistician, epidemiologist or clinical trials methodologist on the team.

At least two groups have systematically reported inclusion of free meals, thus leading to good compliance [ 69, 70, 75, 98– 113] 113].