Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(30)
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.
There have been few previous studies reporting diagnostic changes of probable diagnoses over time [3, 4].
Accredited physician sonographers are self-reliant in performing and reporting diagnostic ultrasound examinations within their area of expertise.
There is a wide variation in reporting diagnostic accuracies of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) between different institutions, ranging from 64% to 97%.
Systematic searches identified 55 meta-analyses that satisfied inclusion criteria of reporting diagnostic accuracy of an index test compared with a reference test.
All papers reporting diagnostic efficacy studies for PET conducted in Japan as original articles were identified through two databases: the international database, MEDLINE, and Ichu-Shi, the domestic Japanese database of the Japan Medical Abstract Society.
Similar(30)
Not all studies reported diagnostic validation.
Two studies reported diagnostic accuracies for diffusion-weighted MR imaging, and both reported a sensitivity of 100%[4345] 45].
There is a wide variation in the reported diagnostic yield of bile duct brush cytology in PSC strictures.
The reported diagnostic ability in determining benign or malignant disease for CT scans is 78% specific [18] that of MRI is 96.6% sensitive and 87.6% specific [19].
Another potential biopsy site is the conjunctiva, with a reported diagnostic yield ranging from 20%to70%0% with blind biopsies[1 4] and 36%to75%5% with directed biopsies[5 8].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com