reported with him

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reported with him" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and does not convey a clear meaning; typically, "reported" would be used with "to" or "about" rather than "with." Example: "The findings were reported to him during the meeting."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The Republican National Committee chair, Reince Priebus, was reported with him.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Rahami was spotted on surveillance video in Chelsea on Saturday evening carrying a backpack and two other bags, the New York Times reported, with later footage showing him without the backpack and leaving one of the other bags by a mailbox.

The Guardian

No problems were reported with the procedure.

Wikipedia

All sites interviewed persons reported with AIDS.

Plosone

Means are reported with the standard deviations.

Plosone

Significance is reported with α = 0.05.

Plosone

Group means are reported with standard deviation.

Plosone

Means are reported with their standard errors.

Plosone

Statistics are reported with standard deviations.

Plosone

Mr. Cheney, too, has been carrying a copy of the commission's report with him this week on a West Coast campaign swing, and told supporters he had read about half of it.

The New York Times

He said Di Montezemolo had not even discussed the reports with him.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "reported with him" in formal writing. Opt for more precise and grammatically correct alternatives such as "reported to him" or "informed him."

Common error

The preposition "with" typically indicates accompaniment or possession, not the recipient of information. Using it after "reported" creates grammatical ambiguity. Always use "to" when indicating who received the report.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reported with him" attempts to describe an act of communication, but its grammatical structure is flawed, rendering it unclear. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is not considered correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reported with him" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI confirms that it is not standard English. While some instances may appear in varied sources like news and media, wiki pages, and science articles, it's best to use alternatives like "reported to him" or "informed him" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness. The phrase's awkward structure undermines its communicative purpose, and selecting more appropriate wording strengthens the overall quality and credibility of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reported to him

This is a standard and grammatically correct alternative, indicating that information was conveyed to him.

informed him

This alternative emphasizes the act of conveying information, similar to reporting.

told him

A simpler and more direct way of saying someone shared information with him.

conveyed to him

A more formal and precise way to indicate that information was passed on.

communicated to him

This suggests a broader range of information sharing, not necessarily formal reporting.

advised him

Implies giving guidance or recommendations, a specific type of reporting.

notified him

Indicates a formal announcement or warning was given.

briefed him

Suggests a concise and informative update was provided.

submitted a report to him

Focuses on the creation and delivery of a formal report.

provided a report for him

Highlights the act of giving a report for his use or review.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say information was given to someone?

The correct way to say information was given to someone is to use "reported to him" or "informed him". The phrase "reported with him" is grammatically incorrect.

What can I use instead of "reported with him"?

Instead of "reported with him", you can use alternatives such as "reported to him", "informed him", or "told him" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "reported with him"?

No, it is not grammatically correct to say "reported with him". The correct usage is "reported to him". Ludwig AI states this phrase is not correct in standard written English.

What's the difference between "reported to him" and "reported with him"?

"Reported to him" indicates that information was conveyed to a specific person. "Reported with him" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't have a clear meaning.